The State of Open Data is a global survey providing insights into researchers’ attitudes towards and experiences of open data. Now in its ninth year, we are delighted to once again partner with Digital Science and Figshare on the longest running survey and analysis on open data.
The 2024 special report ‘Bridging policy and practice in data sharing’ takes an in depth look into what is driving good data sharing practices globally and has now been published.
This year, direct author-sharing practices have been analysed from a funder, country and institutional level. The resulting data shows key trends driving successful open sharing and the growth of global adoption, while also enabling recommendations to be drawn to help bridge the remaining gaps between policy and practice.
The results of this year's analysis will be discussed in a webinar on 23 January 2025, looking at pathways to incentivize open data publishing through innovative metrics, addressing the urgent need for more effective policies, and examining resource disparities across regions.
Attendees will gain a deeper understanding of the importance of tailored support for different disciplines and the necessity of practical resources and training to drive meaningful change in the open data landscape. This is an opportunity to engage with experts and contribute to shaping a more equitable and efficient future for open research.
Speakers: Mark Hahnel, VP Open Research, Digital Science & Graham Smith, Open Data Programme Manager, SSCI Journal Indexing
23rd January 2025 15.00 - 15:30 pm GMT | 10:00 - 10:30 am EST Join the conversation! #StateOfOpenData
Anonymised raw data and questionnaire for the 2024 State of Open Data survey developed between SSCI Journal Indexing, Figshare and Digital Science.
The 2023 survey showed that the key motivations for researchers to share their data remain similar to previous years, with full citation of research papers or a data citation ranking highly. 89% of respondents also said they make their data available publicly.
Variations in responses from different areas of expertise and geographies highlight a need for a more nuanced approach to research data management support globally. For example, 64% of respondents supported the idea of a national mandate for making research data openly available.
For eight years running, our survey has revealed a recurring concern among researchers: the perception that they don't receive sufficient recognition for openly sharing their data. 60% of respondents said they receive too little credit for sharing their data.
We asked survey respondents to indicate if they were using ChatGPT or similar AI tools for data collection, data processing and metadata collection. The most common response to all three questions was ‘I’m aware of these tools but haven’t considered it.’
This supplementary report that expands upon the results of our years of surveys. "From theory to practice" provides real-life perspectives from various research community members on open research data sharing.
This report looks at data collected from the survey over the past 8 years and takes a deep dive into responses from different countries, demonstrating that global trends don’t always align with national trends.
A partner report by the Computer Network Information Centre (CNIC) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, looking at Chinese researchers’ attitudes towards and experiences of open data based on the survey.
Our Research Data Community is a growing forum of advocates for the sharing of research data. It is a great place to interact with other researchers, read the latest information on research data and help advance data sharing practices.
Our Research Data Community is a growing forum of advocates for the sharing of research data. It is a great place to interact with other researchers, read the latest information on research data and help advance data sharing practices.